Browsing this Thread:
1 Anonymous Users
|
Anonymous
|
Re: Amithlon Big Endian-gcc & AROS userland source
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
What about the reverse. Could some of the thing compliled this way for Amithlon be compiled for Aros?
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Amithlon Big Endian-gcc & AROS userland source
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Just can't stay away
![]() |
As long as the programs don't make use of any AROS-specific feature, they should work just fine recompiled for Amithlon.
Posted on: 2005/4/5 21:23
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: Amithlon Big Endian-gcc & AROS userland source
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
![]()
|
That depends on what ABI was used for the x86 part of Amithlon
Posted on: 2005/4/5 19:19
|
|||
|
||||
|
Amithlon Big Endian-gcc & AROS userland source
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
![]() |
Right, this is something I've been thinking about for a long time.
Amithlon is runs the 68k parts of OS3.9 quite speedily, but is capable of running x86-native compiled Amiga software created using gg-i686be-amithlon-gcc compiler. Am I correct in assuming I could compile the AROS source for commands from the C directory such as LIST,DELETE,RUN,RENAME etc using the amithlon-big-endian compiler, and they would run under amithlon as native x86 versions of the old 68k compiled version? Just like we could theoretically compile 68k binaries from the same source? I think this would be a nice way of running a legacy free Amithlon if we replace all the 68k bits of software as much as we can, and we'd get the benefit of the 68k JIT compiler still for other stuff? Am I living in cloud cuckoo land?
Posted on: 2005/4/5 17:31
|
|||
|
||||
You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.
You cannot use topic type.
You cannot use HTML syntax.
You cannot use signature.
You cannot create PDF files.
You cannot get print page.







