Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
Main Menu
Who is Online
15 user(s) are online (12 user(s) are browsing Forum)

Members: 0
Guests: 15

more...


Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users




(1) 2 »


Re: "copy" command implementation and options (DELETE, MOVE, ...)
#16
Home away from home
Home away from home


See User information
so, what's the conclusion? anyone file a bugreport/feature request?

Posted on: 2017/1/22 21:56
 Top  Twitter  Facebook  Google Plus  Linkedin  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Mr. Wong 


Re: "copy" command implementation and options (DELETE, MOVE, ...)
#15
Home away from home
Home away from home


See User information
Quote:

paolone wrote:
Quote:

Kalamatee wrote:
My personal opinion/preference would be?to rename this multi-tool to something more relevant and implement a separate copy command that just does what it?says?on the tin.

Its confusing and dangerous to have?options like this in copy - it would be more obvious in a generic tool with a name that reflects that.


Many options of our copy command are very very useful, though. I wouldn't live in a world where the copy command didn't have ALL, FOOVR and QUIET options!


ALL, FORCE and QUIET are normal copy command options (why we have a stupid FOOVR?_and_?FORCE seems silly..)

Posted on: 2017/1/16 4:33
Resized Image
 Top  Twitter  Facebook  Google Plus  Linkedin  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Mr. Wong 


Re: "copy" command implementation and options (DELETE, MOVE, ...)
#14
Home away from home
Home away from home


See User information
Quote:

paolone wrote:
Many options of our copy command are very very useful, though. I wouldn't live in a world where the copy command didn't have ALL, FOOVR and QUIET options!


me too. so we all agree that "copy DELETE" is nonsense & dangerous, right?

Posted on: 2017/1/15 4:53
 Top  Twitter  Facebook  Google Plus  Linkedin  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Mr. Wong 


Re: "copy" command implementation and options (DELETE, MOVE, ...)
#13
Home away from home
Home away from home


See User information
Quote:

Kalamatee wrote:
My personal opinion/preference would be?to rename this multi-tool to something more relevant and implement a separate copy command that just does what it?says?on the tin.

Its confusing and dangerous to have?options like this in copy - it would be more obvious in a generic tool with a name that reflects that.


Many options of our copy command are very very useful, though. I wouldn't live in a world where the copy command didn't have ALL, FOOVR and QUIET options!

Posted on: 2017/1/14 17:52
p.bes
Icaros Desktop AROS distribution mantainer
 Top  Twitter  Facebook  Google Plus  Linkedin  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Mr. Wong 


Re: "copy" command implementation and options (DELETE, MOVE, ...)
#12
Home away from home
Home away from home


See User information
Quote:

ntromans wrote:
what was the problem with BackupCopy?


at some point it complained about memory or storage (I can't remember right now) and stopped working, but there was still plenty of diskspace and hundrets of megabytes of RAM left... ?

(and it looked as if it was copying everything, regardless of existing target files - but I didn't really check that, maybe targetfiles' dates were indeed older than the sourcefiles' ones. source dir was on a AROS partition, target dir was on a vfat-usb-stick.)

(before we're going further off-topic maybe you wanna create a separate thread for BackupCopy discussion? might be helpful to others, too.)

Posted on: 2017/1/13 18:53
 Top  Twitter  Facebook  Google Plus  Linkedin  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Mr. Wong 


Re: "copy" command implementation and options (DELETE, MOVE, ...)
#11
Home away from home
Home away from home


See User information
Hi roMancer,
Just out of interest, what was the problem with BackupCopy?

Cheers,
Nigel.

Posted on: 2017/1/13 18:00
 Top  Twitter  Facebook  Google Plus  Linkedin  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Mr. Wong 


Re: "copy" command implementation and options (DELETE, MOVE, ...)
#10
Home away from home
Home away from home


See User information
Quote:

Kalamatee wrote:
My personal opinion/preference would be?to rename this multi-tool to something more relevant and implement a separate copy command that just does what it?says?on the tin.


We once had that. It was then replaced by the version of Dirk Stoeker that we maintain since 16 years. S. Duvan, who did the commit, indeed emphasized the completeness of the tool

Posted on: 2017/1/12 18:29
Everyone knew it was impossible. Along came a fool who did not know and he did it.
 Top  Twitter  Facebook  Google Plus  Linkedin  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Mr. Wong 


Re: "copy" command implementation and options (DELETE, MOVE, ...)
#9
Home away from home
Home away from home


See User information
@ntromans:
thanks, I just tried "BackupCopy" - umh, didn't work that well for me, but I'll keep an eye on it

@kalamatee:
"confusing and dangerous to have options like this in copy" - +1

@all/topic:
regarding option NEWER:
as I said above, it's highly questionable to check version strings as they're often outdated or missing. but I just realized: "copy NEWER" is completely useless (probably unpredictable, maybe even dangerous) when working on e.g. folders of image files, text files, etc., in other words: large amounts of files that do not have a $VER-version string at all, and by definition.

Posted on: 2017/1/12 17:55
 Top  Twitter  Facebook  Google Plus  Linkedin  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Mr. Wong 


Re: "copy" command implementation and options (DELETE, MOVE, ...)
#8
Home away from home
Home away from home


See User information
My personal opinion/preference would be?to rename this multi-tool to something more relevant and implement a separate copy command that just does what it?says?on the tin.

Its confusing and dangerous to have?options like this in copy - it would be more obvious in a generic tool with a name that reflects that.

Posted on: 2017/1/12 15:16
Resized Image
 Top  Twitter  Facebook  Google Plus  Linkedin  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Mr. Wong 


Re: "copy" command implementation and options (DELETE, MOVE, ...)
#7
Home away from home
Home away from home


See User information
I would not "delete Copy DELETE" but I agree that a warning would make sense, especially if NOREQ disables this warning.
BTW Morphos seems to share our very Copy command, dunno if they ever had this discussion?

Posted on: 2017/1/12 14:44
Everyone knew it was impossible. Along came a fool who did not know and he did it.
 Top  Twitter  Facebook  Google Plus  Linkedin  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Mr. Wong 




(1) 2 »



You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.
You cannot use topic type.
You cannot use HTML syntax.
You cannot use signature.
You cannot create PDF files.
You cannot get print page.

[Advanced Search]


Search
Top Posters
1 paolone
paolone
4462
2 nikolaos
nikolaos
4206
3 magorium
magorium
4095
4 phoenixkonsole
phoenixkonsole
3942
5 deadwood
deadwood
2917
6 ncafferkey
ncafferkey
2810
7 mazze
mazze
2222
8 Kalamatee
Kalamatee
2212
9 clusteruk
clusteruk
2114
Powered by XOOPS © 2001-2025 The XOOPS Project