Browsing this Thread:
1 Anonymous Users
|
Re: ACPI
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
![]()
|
Nice! That's quite well organized.
Posted on: 2005/6/27 2:08
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: ACPI
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
![]()
|
Posted on: 2005/6/26 20:10
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: APIC
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
![]()
|
Quote:
Well, The bounty is more ACPI than APIC related, so i would use the former name not later. Oops! Noted and corrected, thanks Kal! Dammy
Posted on: 2005/6/26 12:30
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: APIC
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
![]()
|
Well, The bounty is more ACPI than APIC related, so i would use the former name not later.
Also as i mentioned before, supporting all of the drivers requires a lot more effort than enough support for IRQ routing and SMP, IMO it would be better as 2 bounties.. one for the initial acpi support (irq routing etc) then a further one to enable acpi to be more functional / useable (support for compiling acpi code to write drivers etc) Specifically - find and init all CPUs (1st bounty) - control speed and power of CPUs (2nd bounty - not needed initially) - control power of other hardware through ACPI (1st bounty - basic system config from irq table data - irq routing, ints etc. further support in 2nd bounty for external devices to use ACPI, drivers ACPI support as seperate bounties?) - monitor battery via ACPI (support 2nd bounty, driver itself a seperate bounty?) - monitor case and lid through ACPI (support 2nd bounty, driver itself a seperate bounty?) - high-res timer via ACPI (2nd bounty) Trying to do it all in one will probably just end up with a lame port of an existing and un amigaos like api .. Thats my 2 cents
Posted on: 2005/6/26 8:00
|
|||
|
||||
|
Re: APIC
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
![]()
|
Sounds good to me.
Posted on: 2005/6/26 3:45
|
|||
|
||||
|
ACPI
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Home away from home
![]()
|
1. The interrupt subsystem must support local APIC interrupt handling:
- find and init all CPUs - control speed and power of CPUs - control power of other hardware through ACPI - monitor battery via ACPI - monitor case and lid through ACPI - high-res timer via ACPI 2. On multi-processor systems, it must set up all CPUs, leaving all but the first in a waiting state (for when SMP gets going). 3. Test must include inter-processor communication via ints. The test could be native AROS program which reported the other CPUs and did a test on their int subsystem. 4. The other CPUs don't have to do anything useful at this point - merely respond to ints showing their local ACPI handler is functional. ----------- Any suggestions on how to word this better? Dammy TeamAROS
Posted on: 2005/6/25 20:11
|
|||
|
||||
You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.
You cannot use topic type.
You cannot use HTML syntax.
You cannot use signature.
You cannot create PDF files.
You cannot get print page.





