cdimauro wrote:
Debugging (and not only) extensions were my "heat in the kitchen", in fact, so I agree with your last sentence.

cdimauro wrote:
Quote:

terminills wrote:

So you didn?t contribute anything gotcha.

Which means nothing: Intel's SGX extension doesn't stop working as it was designed by Intel only because I didn't contribute to AROS.

AMD processors doesn't require a bigger cooling system for the same reason.

And so on...

The technical information which I've reported in this thread doesn't stop be facts only because of my lack of contributions to AROS.

Elementary logic at hands, they are not-connected, completely different things.
Quote:

And for the second I was merely asking which was correct. :)

Did you approve or not what the guy fired to me?

Just to be clear, since we should be adult people, eh! No joke with the words: be explicit.

terminills wrote:

So you didn?t contribute anything gotcha.

And for the second I was merely asking which was correct. :)

cdimauro wrote:
Quote:

terminills wrote:
Quote:

cdimauro wrote:
@AROS-Confidence1: No, that's not all the true story. Read all messages that were written from the beginning.

@Kalamatee: pathetic is the one which tried to cheat people, picking from their wallets for getting a new toy.

My technical questions are still waiting for technical answers/facts. Which you clearly don't want to give, and now you're trying to change the cards on the table in a childish way.

I have one question for you. What have you actually contributed to AROS or its community?

This is NOT relevant to the topic, and they are two combined logical fallacies.

1) you're trying to change the topic. Here's the topic:
Quote:

I need a high end core i7 though because of features that are in the chip that aren't in AMD chips (that massively help with debugging, particularly something as complex as the interactions that occur under smp) and because of the performance requirements needed to run multiple virtual machines/builds (we are talking 15+ builds of AROS at any one time to put it into context).

In bold the defined requirements, which are (should be. IN THEORY, since it's clearly shown that the real goal was a different one) the kernel of the discussion.

2) you're invoking the so called "principle of authority". So, only someone which has contributed to AROS can speak about the topic. Which is clearly not true.

Quote:

AROS-Confidence1 wrote:
@cdimauro

The only one who is cheating is you.. you are offending kalamatee for no reason.

See above, and the previous messages.

There were requirements that had to be satisfied. But the real goal was another one.
Quote:

what are you even putting your cock into this, if you haven't got anything constructive to say!

First, I've already written TECHNICAL things about what was supposed to be the topic. If you have something to say about them, then go ahead, and you can also answer my TECHNICAL questions which are currently lacking a (TECHNICAL) answer (guess why...), right?

Second, you're insulting with bad words, which is typical of people which is lacking arguments on a discussion.

Nothing new here.

Quote:

terminills wrote:
Quote:

AROS-Confidence1 wrote:
@cdimauro

The only one who is cheating is you.. you are offending kalamatee for no reason. what are you even putting your cock into this, if you haven't got anything constructive to say!

Wouldn?t the correct offensive term be ?cock holster?? :)

Same as above. No arguments -> insulting.

Ridiculous.

I want to remind you that it was NOT me that put on the table the requirements for a PC. And which became harsh on the discussion which was then originated (no, not only with me: look at the previous messages).